Jump to content

Clayton

AF Member
  • Posts

    1,203
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

Status Replies posted by Clayton

  1. Why was I given a warning for "Impersonating staff"? I in no way posted that I was a staff member, I merely told the person who posted in a thread I started on Muscular Anime Women that the girl he posted was not in fact a muscular anime woman. 

    1. Clayton

      Clayton

      HARMFUL FANSERRVICE?! What language are you speaking?

      While I understand you having an aversion to rule breaking stuff, again discussing sex, including sex in anime, is not a bad thing. 

       

      How is fanservice harmful? In many cases it's the entire basis of many fine anime from Sailor Moon to DBZ. Outlaw Star (Did you see episode 25?) and many more. 

    2. (See 8 other replies to this status update)

  2. Why was I given a warning for "Impersonating staff"? I in no way posted that I was a staff member, I merely told the person who posted in a thread I started on Muscular Anime Women that the girl he posted was not in fact a muscular anime woman. 

    1. Clayton

      Clayton

      And again I did not post any 18+ material. I merely asked to discuss what people find attractive. Also keep in mind that anime is full of full frontal nudity, swearing, and sex in animes rated 13+ to 17+ Nightwalker for example. And that's not considering stuff that you can technically see through clothing. For example nipples are often clearly visible when wearing a sheer nearly see through robe, but are not there when the same character is naked

       

      Dragonball has nudity, Bulma flashes Roshi, and Goku has been seen peeing in public

       

      The credits of Tenchi series and several others have nudity that sometimes does not appear in the show

       

      Sailor Moon's clothes vanish. 

       

      Interspecies relations. 

       

      My Hero Academia had a character who intentionally gets himself thrown into a fellow teenage class mate's ample breasts. 

       

      I posted a thread about discussing what fetishes people like. It had no nudity, no wear words, and I was very specific about NOT going into graphic detail. And you immediately chastised me rather than trying to discuss it and explain why it was a problem. I did not in fact break any rules and participation  was voluntary. 

    2. (See 8 other replies to this status update)

  3. Why was I given a warning for "Impersonating staff"? I in no way posted that I was a staff member, I merely told the person who posted in a thread I started on Muscular Anime Women that the girl he posted was not in fact a muscular anime woman. 

    1. Clayton

      Clayton

      I fail to see why, but okay. In the future maybe when I'm not breaking any actual rules you could tell me you disapprove and you can suggest how I can make it more appropriate by your standards. 

    2. (See 8 other replies to this status update)

  4. Why was I given a warning for "Impersonating staff"? I in no way posted that I was a staff member, I merely told the person who posted in a thread I started on Muscular Anime Women that the girl he posted was not in fact a muscular anime woman. 

    1. Clayton

      Clayton

      Oh was it that "Fetish" thread? I thought I was very good about not getting descriptive and it seemed appropriate since everything I mentioned was something many anime and characters are based on. I went out of my way not to use foul language or post nudity and only asked what people were into rather than asking for any inappropriate details. 

       

      Please tell me exactly why discussing such things, again without using any inappropriate language or images, got me in trouble. 

      In any case please remove the false accusation. 

    2. (See 8 other replies to this status update)

  5. You never explained what "inappropriate" pictures I supposedly posted. I distinctly avoided any nudity, foul language, and stuck to the topic at hand. I'm not arguing, just asking for clarification. 

    1. Clayton

      Clayton

      WHy am I being censured NOW? I wasn't even on yesterday and haven't posted any new content with boobs. 

    2. (See 14 other replies to this status update)

  6. You never explained what "inappropriate" pictures I supposedly posted. I distinctly avoided any nudity, foul language, and stuck to the topic at hand. I'm not arguing, just asking for clarification. 

    1. Clayton

      Clayton

      Cartoon characters and individual body parts are in fact objects. 

    2. (See 14 other replies to this status update)

  7. You never explained what "inappropriate" pictures I supposedly posted. I distinctly avoided any nudity, foul language, and stuck to the topic at hand. I'm not arguing, just asking for clarification. 

    1. Clayton

      Clayton

      Again, we were discussing breasts. Not people. 

    2. (See 14 other replies to this status update)

  8. You never explained what "inappropriate" pictures I supposedly posted. I distinctly avoided any nudity, foul language, and stuck to the topic at hand. I'm not arguing, just asking for clarification. 

    1. Clayton

      Clayton

      Again you haven't explained what was wrong witht he images I did post. 

    2. (See 14 other replies to this status update)

  9. You never explained what "inappropriate" pictures I supposedly posted. I distinctly avoided any nudity, foul language, and stuck to the topic at hand. I'm not arguing, just asking for clarification. 

    1. Clayton

      Clayton

      Which is why i also used my words and gave long detailed explanations. i did not just post boob pics. 

    2. (See 14 other replies to this status update)

  10. You never explained what "inappropriate" pictures I supposedly posted. I distinctly avoided any nudity, foul language, and stuck to the topic at hand. I'm not arguing, just asking for clarification. 

    1. Clayton

      Clayton

      offensive how? Keeping in mind the topic of the thread was breasts. 

    2. (See 14 other replies to this status update)

  11. *Stressed*

    1. Clayton

      Clayton

      Just think WWTDDD: What would the Digidestined Do?

       

       

    2. (See 7 other replies to this status update)

×
×
  • Create New...